The Turnbull government's pledge of an additional $60 million to help improve the health of the Great Barrier Reef has been dismissed by environmental groups and scientists as insufficient and a "wasteful publicity stunt".
The government's pledge of the funds over 18 months includes $10.4 million for "an all-out assault" to reduce the impact of coral-eating crown-of-thorns starfish, the government said in a statement.
Great Barrier Reef's bleached coral up close
Parts of the Great Barrier Reef are enduring sustained periods of heat stress worse than at the same time during last year's record-breaking coral bleaching event, raising fears the natural wonder may suffer another hammering.Vision supplied: Biopixel.
The number of vessels used to curb the spread of the starfish will increase from three to eightParts of the Great Barrier Reef are enduring sustained periods of heat stress worse than at the same time during last year's record-breaking coral bleaching event, raising fears the natural wonder may suffer another hammering.Vision supplied: Biopixel.
About $36.6 million will also go to further reduce the run-off of nutrients and other pollution from farms near the Great Barrier Reef.
"The reef is the world's largest living structure and a global natural icon," the statement said.
Jon Brodie, a Professorial Fellow with the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies at James Cook University, said the funding would likely make little difference particularly if spent on programs already shown to be ineffective.
He said these included crown-of-thorns efforts that appear to have minimal impact on numbers despite removing 500,000 starfish, and whose full results were not being made public – as Fairfax Media reported last week.
Dr Brodie said the federal and state governments' own water quality report card in 2016 indicated funding needed to be closer to a $1 billion per year over a decade.
 |
| Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull visits the Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) to unveil the 'rescue plan' for the reef. Photo: Michael Chambers |
The Australian Institute of Marine Science, one recipient of money to develop a new Reef Restoration and Adaptation Program, welcomed the funds but noted any recovery hinged on dealing with the threat from climate change.
 |
| Crown-of-thorns starfish being lured to one location - for possible easier extermination. Photo: University of Queensland |
"These methods will need to go hand in hand with greenhouse gas mitigation and conventional management" such as no-fish zones, Paul Hardisty, the institute's chief executive, said.
"But they could be the difference in our efforts to preserve and protect the reef, and the tremendous value it provides to all Australians."
 |
| John Rumney from the Great Barrier Reef Legacy takes a close look at bleaching corals near Port Douglas. Photo: Dean Miller/GBR Legacy |
 |
| IMAGE |
 |
| Some 64,000 jobs rely on the health of the Great Barrier Reef, especially tourism. Photo: Supplied |
No state consultation
A spokesman for Leeanne Enoch, Queensland's new Minister for the Great Barrier Reef, said the Turnbull government hadn't consulted the Labor state government ahead of Monday's announcement.
 |
| Bleaching corals display vivid fluorescent colours before turning completely white. Photo: E.Matson, AIMS |
Federal officials made contact with state counterparts on Monday to discuss how the funding would be rolled out, he said.
WWF-Australia welcomed the funding as "positive but nowhere near enough to meet Australia's promise to the World Heritage Committee".
The group said Australia had promised to cut sediment flowing into the reef by as much as half by 2025 and nitrogen pollution by 80 per cent.
"The funding announced today won't get us to the water quality targets we promised UNESCO" to maintain the World Heritage status of the reef, Sean Hoobin, WWF-Australia spokesman said.
"Failing on these targets is failing the reef," Mr Hoobin said. "With almost half the coral cover lost to bleaching over the last two years the reef needs a massive new investment to help it respond to global warming."
WWF has called for the government to commit $475 million a year for the next four years to improve water quality in key Great Barrier Reef catchments.
Unprecedented back-to-back bleaching hit the central and northern regions of the reef hard over the past two years and there are indications of some bleaching at the southern end this summer, Dr Brodie said.
Links
- 'Serious case of negligence': Scientists blast controls on coral-eating starfish
- UN environment head warns against new coal projects
- Great Barrier Reef: Rising Temperatures Turning Green Sea Turtles Female
- Great Barrier Reef Will Be Dead By 2100, Says David Attenborough's Blue Planet II
- Why Climate Change Is A Key Issue In The Queensland Election
- Warming Limit Of 1.2 Degrees Needed To Save Great Barrier Reef: Expert Panel
- While Corals Die Along The Great Barrier Reef, Humans Struggle To Adjust
- The Great Barrier Reef Isn’t Listed As ‘In Danger’ – But It’s Still In Big Trouble
- The Long Goodbye: Coal, Coral and Australia's Climate Deadlock
No comments :
Post a Comment